How to get patent in Canada?

  Intellectual property is not merely a legal asset—it's a financial instrument. Yet many U.S. companies fail to treat patents with the same rigour they apply to revenue forecasting, M&A strategy, or cost optimization. This negligence isn’t passive oversight. It reflects a deeper issue: patents are often disconnected from financial planning and operational strategy. According to a 2024 IP Value Benchmarking Study, fewer than 12% of corporate patent portfolios generate direct revenue. That means the vast majority represent sunk costs—money spent on filing, maintenance, and legal fees without monetization. For More Updates,  Click Here.

  Standard‑essential patent (SEP) owners deploy a strategy of aggressive declaration to the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) and 3GPP standard‑setting records. Many portfolios list tens of thousands of declared patent families, yet independent studies show only a fraction meet true essentiality tests. That discrepancy allows owners to wield inflated negotiating power while implementers face uncertainty about actual relevance. Canadian manufacturers participating in global supply‑chains must recognize this tactic early. For More Updates,  Click Here.

  As innovation accelerates, the ability to unlock value from intellectual property (IP) is more critical than ever. In 2025, Canadian firms must adapt by adopting forward-thinking strategies to monetize patents, boost licensing revenues, and enhance IP valuation. This guide outlines seven high-impact approaches to navigate the evolving landscape of IP monetization . For More Updates,  Click Here.

  In Canada’s fast‑paced innovation ecosystem, many organizations overestimate or misjudge their intellectual property worth. Misconceptions about patent valuation myths regularly lead to serious consequences. Companies assuming guaranteed value from their patent portfolios risk unexpected financial setbacks. In 2025, evolving markets, shifting regulations, and rising competition magnify exposure. This article uncovers five dangerous myths that could cost firms millions, clarifying how to protect their IP assets and leverage high‑value patents smartly. For More Updates,  Click Here.

  Artificial intelligence revolutionizes how analysts interpret intellectual property data. In Canada, technology stakeholders monitor breakthroughs with keen interest because AI transforms legacy processes. Amid surging innovation, patent offices embrace tools that sift through massive filings. Researchers unearth patterns in patent portfolios faster than ever before using machine learning and natural language processing. For More Updates, Click Here.

  Standard Essential Patent (SEP) verification impacts every company that builds to or uses technical standards. Brands that neglect this verification expose themselves to costly litigation, unexpected licensing fees, and reputational risk. In Canada and globally, courts, regulators, and patent holders have escalated the enforcement of SEP rights. Once a patent becomes “standard essential,” implementers lose flexibility. They must either license on FRAND (Fair, Reasonable, Non‑Discriminatory) terms or defend challenges over validity, essentiality, or royalty base. Verification ensures legitimacy, protects innovation, and prevents abusive practices. For More Updates, Click Here.

  Innovators across Canada increasingly recognize that IP market intelligence plays a decisive role in maintaining competitive advantage. Real‑time patent monitoring reveals trending technologies, competitor filings, and infringement risks. Entrepreneurs, R&D teams, and legal departments demand immediate access to fresh data. Such urgency explains why 63 % of innovators now rely upon continuous surveillance rather than periodic reviews. For More Updates, Click Here.

  Canadian entrepreneurs often overlook critical risks until lawsuits strike. Trademark dispute facts can devastate growth. IP law Canada provides frameworks, yet startups still make avoidable mistakes. Understanding those missteps helps protect innovation, brand, and investment. 1. Prior Use Beats Clever Design Trademark dispute facts begin with the rule: someone who used a similar mark earlier in a relevant context typically wins. Even simple rebranding fails when established companies show prior use across regions. Canadian startups seldom check historic filings thoroughly. IP law Canada mandates comprehensive searches before adoption. Neglecting that opens doors to opposition or cancellation. For More Updates, Click Here.

  Introduction: Why IP Research Demands Accuracy IP Research determines the strength of patents, trademarks, and designs in Canada’ s fast-changing innovation landscape. Whether companies use artificial intelligence or traditional methods, the accuracy of data remains the foundation of effective intellectual property strategy. A single error in documentation, ownership details, or prior art records can derail years of effort, leading to costly disputes or missed opportunities. For More Updates, Click Here.

Patent Infringement remains a central issue in Canadian intellectual property law, shaping how innovators safeguard their inventions. Recently, a Federal Court decision dismissed a high-profile infringement claim, sending a strong signal to businesses, inventors, and legal practitioners. The outcome not only clarifies judicial attitudes toward evidence and ownership but also highlights the need for thorough research before filing costly actions. For More Updates Click Here.

  AI Training and Copyright AI Training and Copyright have become hotly debated issues as technology continues to reshape intellectual property law. A recent U.S. court ruling has sent shockwaves through both the tech and legal industries, clarifying how artificial intelligence can utilize creative works during its training process. This groundbreaking decision not only influences developers and creators but also sets the stage for how future disputes may unfold. For More Updates,  Click Here.

  Trademarks with Pre-Approved Goods and Services Trademarks remain essential for protecting brand identity, securing exclusive rights, and building consumer trust. Recent policy changes at the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) have altered the way businesses approach filing strategies. The accelerated examination pathway, once available for applications using pre-approved goods and services, has officially been discontinued. This decision reshapes the trademark landscape in Canada and requires applicants to rethink their timelines, budgets, and expectations. For More Updates,  Click Here.

  Introduction In 2024, a U.S.-based biotech company came within inches of a catastrophic $12 million patent infringement lawsuit. The trigger? A breakthrough therapeutic molecule that overlapped—unbeknownst to them—with an existing protected claim. But a last-minute Freedom-to-Operate (FTO) search  exposed the legal minefield just in time. FTO searches are the unsung heroes of innovation—systematic investigations that reveal whether a product or process infringes on any existing patents. In a landscape as litigious as biotech, the real question isn’t “Can we build this?”  but “Can we bring it to market legally?” Let’s explore how an FTO search turned a looming disaster into a competitive advantage—and why biotech innovators in India and Canada  should take note. #patentoffice #patentapplication #patent #patentlawyer #patentsearch #intellectualproperty #patentpending #uspto #illustration #patentportfolio #patentdrawings #pct #patentdrafting #pctfiling #patentabilit...